Utah declares “Trees are the enemy,” and crafts plan to burn or chop down millions of trees, as the only remaining option to address record droughts in the state

| Category: General

Reddit Image
Source

image

Filed Under: General

« Federal judge finds poultry companies’ chicken poop polluted Oklahoma’s scenic rivers
FBI searches Biden’s Wilmington home and finds more classified materials »

Comments

  1. TILTNSTACK says

    Them trees be drinking our water. We don’t take kindly to that around here.

    The stupid. It hurts

  2. CoveyIsHere says

    This sounds like a Texas thing to say. Utah is officially Diet Texas.

  3. EpitomeJim says

    Going for Dustbowl 2.0 I see.

  4. SaltyBarDog says

    “Trees cause more pollution than automobiles do.“
    -Saint Jellybeans

  5. Pastel_Phoenix_106 says

    Leaving us only to ponder how the oxygen drought started….

    Seriously, this is some Spaceballs energy right here.

  6. EightandaHalf-Tails says

    People from Utah: We need to build and water cities in the middle of a literal desert.

    Also People from Utah: Trees are taking all our water!

  7. Nanyea says

    They do know that it’s moreso an issue with their aquifers …. And this is going to turn them into a desert …right … Is there a scientist in the room?

  8. platanthera_ciliaris says

    Trees prevent soil erosion, excessive water runoff, and release any water that is absorbed back into the atmosphere, causing rain to fall somewhere else. They raise the humidity level of the atmosphere, not to mention producing oxygen (for us to breathe) and taking in carbon dioxide. Trees also moderate the temperature, reducing high temperatures during summer, so there is less water evaporation from the ground and open water in surrounding areas.

    Trees also provide wood for lumber and food for wildlife.

  9. ElDoo74 says

    Look how well this worked in Greece and the Sahara.

  10. Muppet_Cartel says

    Utah often has some of the worst air quality in the world. Losing the trees will be a short term problem leading to a long term travesty.

  11. PattersonsOlady says

    But trees have been scientifically proven to generate more rain

    Oh that’s right … science

  12. OmegaMountain says

    Mormons… They sure do love their crazy…

  13. dlrdlrdlr says

    “But he pointed out that 42% of snow that falls on conifers remains on the branches and is lost, and those trees can grow a foot a year.” Does anyone know what this means. Is he implying that snow never melts or falls to the ground and is just going to sit eternally on top of the trees? Where is the snow lost to?

  14. iwant2dollars says

    Weirdly, even though the quote is real, the title is somewhat misleading. Another quote says the problem isn’t the number of trees but the type.

  15. BTExp says

    No one actually read the article I guess. The snow supervisor stated that conifer trees are 200 per acre whereas at 1900 there were 10 to 20 per acre. The conifer branches don’t allow the snow to reach the ground and most is absorbed instead of hitting the ground. The snow fall won’t support that many and all of them are weakened and millions die as a result. He stated it is not the amount of trees, it is the species that is damaging the forest.

  • Learned
  • Explain