It’s the only way to protect ourselves from time travelers. If they don’t have these chemicals throughout their bodies we can identify them and eliminate them.
Did you know that the US military believes our national security relies on something called ‘forever chemicals’? Crazy, right? These chemicals are so persistent that they stick around forever. It’s like the Energizer bunny of chemicals. Bet you didn’t see that coming!
“Military says, entirely truthfully, that forbidding the manufacture of their current equipment would either skyrocket costs as all the suppliers scramble to develop replacements, or hamper readiness by forcing them to purchase less (and shut down entire facilities that can no longer be safely run because they’re missing essential equipment).”
The headline is funny, but the actual article is not really that surprising, nor absurd.
AbeFromanEast says
“Military contractors say profitability depends on using ‘forever chemicals'”
Fixed the headline for ya
AjaxDoom1 says
It’s the only way to protect ourselves from time travelers. If they don’t have these chemicals throughout their bodies we can identify them and eliminate them.
suoinguon says
Did you know that the US military believes our national security relies on something called ‘forever chemicals’? Crazy, right? These chemicals are so persistent that they stick around forever. It’s like the Energizer bunny of chemicals. Bet you didn’t see that coming!
midz411 says
Fuck the military.
DecentChanceOfLousy says
“Military says, entirely truthfully, that forbidding the manufacture of their current equipment would either skyrocket costs as all the suppliers scramble to develop replacements, or hamper readiness by forcing them to purchase less (and shut down entire facilities that can no longer be safely run because they’re missing essential equipment).”
The headline is funny, but the actual article is not really that surprising, nor absurd.
mymar101 says
I’d argue national security depends on removing them at the earliest convenience