Let’s not ignore what this underwear issue is all about. The butt it goes on. This is perhaps the only area of economics where I’m for a supply-side approach and that we should not be having a booty tax — even on the people who have ALL the booty.
This is an investment in America’s happiness. Subsidize the good underwear and all the other things will fall into place.
Doesn’t it already? I’m sure there a Walmart value pack for the panties, but aren’t bras stupid expensive? Then it gets worse the deeper you get into the nicer shit.
bdrwr says
But they’re made using way less material
flowersintherain3 says
There really is a pink tax!
SmackEh says
Women underwear is (can be) very luxurious, compared to what’s available for men.
That being said, if underwear is expensive then it would be effectively taxed more simply by how percentages work…
Fake_William_Shatner says
Let’s not ignore what this underwear issue is all about. The butt it goes on. This is perhaps the only area of economics where I’m for a supply-side approach and that we should not be having a booty tax — even on the people who have ALL the booty.
This is an investment in America’s happiness. Subsidize the good underwear and all the other things will fall into place.
RacoonSmuggler says
>he estimated that the current US tariff system adds about $1.10 to each pair of women’s underwear and about $0.75 to men’s.
About 35 cents a pair more.
I0A0I says
Doesn’t it already? I’m sure there a Walmart value pack for the panties, but aren’t bras stupid expensive? Then it gets worse the deeper you get into the nicer shit.
HoppityHooper says
Many men, meanwhile, would love seeing women’s underwear come down.
[deleted] says
[deleted]
Kind_Bullfrog_4073 says
This must be why some want a woman president.
not_a_gumby says
thats why my girlfriend never wears panties, they’re too expensive .