I actually agree with this form of civil liberty. They are simply giving examples of the content they disagree with, and the board is to vote on it. The exact point is that some content should be monitored to age appropriate groups and settings (well ok the moms want them straight banned, I was trying). Unfettered access to “50 shades” to my 12 year old is not responsible in my opinion.
GetlostMaps says
The irony – they want the right to read the book in order to get the book banned.
thejikz says
I actually agree with this form of civil liberty. They are simply giving examples of the content they disagree with, and the board is to vote on it. The exact point is that some content should be monitored to age appropriate groups and settings (well ok the moms want them straight banned, I was trying). Unfettered access to “50 shades” to my 12 year old is not responsible in my opinion.