>Turning to Cheryl Morman, president of the Virginia Alliance for Family Child Care Associations, Mullin asked: “So which one is better?”
>Morman said: “I disagree. First, it is important that we teach Jesus and Jesus is what we teach.”
>Mullin interjected: “So which one is better?”
>Morman said: “But the reality is –”
>Mullin cut her off: “I don’t want reality, I’m asking the question, which one is better?”
You’re more concerned about a partial quote in response to a person not answering a question rather than a person saying they teach Jesus in schools?
He was talking about schools teaching a book called “Our Skin” that specifically states:
“A long time ago, way before you were born. A group of white people made up an idea called ‘race’. They sorted people by skin color and said that white people were better smarter and prettier and they deserve more than anybody else.”
He then compared this intentionally very divisive and racist book to a religious hymn about everybody regardless of skin color is loved by Jesus.
His question is which of the 2 would be better for children to hear. “So I ask everyone on the panel, which one is better to teach: This [book], or the Jesus loves me lyrics?”
Instead of answering, the first 2 women start trying to do mental gymnastics as to why it’s important to teach children that white people are racist, and dodge his question. Then the third lady follows the other’s lead and attempts her mental gymnastics before he interrupts her, asking for an answer to his question, seemingly out of frustration that no one will honestly answer his question. He then says the line, “No I don’t want reality, I’m asking the question, which one is better?”
Important to note that part of the 3rd ladies attempt at justifying racially dividing children was saying “but in reality-” which was about when he started interrupting her to tell her to answer his question. He then says he misspoke seconds later, which was obvious.
Another attempt at trying to hide a common democrat L.
_ToPimpAButterfree_ says
Little Freudian slip there Senator
jlevy1126 says
Republican says the quiet part out loud.
mytrickytrick says
>Turning to Cheryl Morman, president of the Virginia Alliance for Family Child Care Associations, Mullin asked: “So which one is better?”
>Morman said: “I disagree. First, it is important that we teach Jesus and Jesus is what we teach.”
>Mullin interjected: “So which one is better?”
>Morman said: “But the reality is –”
>Mullin cut her off: “I don’t want reality, I’m asking the question, which one is better?”
You’re more concerned about a partial quote in response to a person not answering a question rather than a person saying they teach Jesus in schools?
[deleted] says
[removed]
Wienerwrld says
“I don’t want reality, I want Jesus!”🙄
Musetrigger says
Just another shithead crying socialism.
excess_pennies says
“We need to teach jesus” how about keep your fucking bullshit in church and stop shoving it on kids, you bunch of fucking groomers.
Concerned-_-Citizen says
[https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/solving-the-child-care-crisis-meeting-the-needs-of-working-families-and-child-care-workers](https://www.help.senate.gov/hearings/solving-the-child-care-crisis-meeting-the-needs-of-working-families-and-child-care-workers)
1:18:25
He was talking about schools teaching a book called “Our Skin” that specifically states:
“A long time ago, way before you were born. A group of white people made up an idea called ‘race’. They sorted people by skin color and said that white people were better smarter and prettier and they deserve more than anybody else.”
He then compared this intentionally very divisive and racist book to a religious hymn about everybody regardless of skin color is loved by Jesus.
His question is which of the 2 would be better for children to hear. “So I ask everyone on the panel, which one is better to teach: This [book], or the Jesus loves me lyrics?”
Instead of answering, the first 2 women start trying to do mental gymnastics as to why it’s important to teach children that white people are racist, and dodge his question. Then the third lady follows the other’s lead and attempts her mental gymnastics before he interrupts her, asking for an answer to his question, seemingly out of frustration that no one will honestly answer his question. He then says the line, “No I don’t want reality, I’m asking the question, which one is better?”
Important to note that part of the 3rd ladies attempt at justifying racially dividing children was saying “but in reality-” which was about when he started interrupting her to tell her to answer his question. He then says he misspoke seconds later, which was obvious.
Another attempt at trying to hide a common democrat L.
cbbuntz says
We know
Crimson_Eyes says
Headline blatantly misrepresents the situation.
wwarnout says
Willful ignorance is far worse than Kool-aid – and this guy proved it.