>Groupe Robert, meanwhile, told April that the collective agreement between the company and the union representing drivers is clear: The penalty for drinking and driving is immediate termination of employment.
They say that yet waited 2 full months to fire her, during which she told them she had a problem and completed an in-patient addiction problem. If your defence is going to be that agreement, at least ensure you followed it.
King-of-New-York says
A “disability” like no other. C’est la vie.
Seyon says
The article doesn’t mention any orders. It says the teamsters union is defending her regardless of circumstances.
Which is what they are required to do, they represent the worker.
chocowich says
I’m willing to be fellow drunkards ordered this.
wecookingitup says
Some guys can drink and drive, some guys can’t… I mean what is drunk?
ran_awd says
>Groupe Robert, meanwhile, told April that the collective agreement between the company and the union representing drivers is clear: The penalty for drinking and driving is immediate termination of employment.
They say that yet waited 2 full months to fire her, during which she told them she had a problem and completed an in-patient addiction problem. If your defence is going to be that agreement, at least ensure you followed it.
Itzchappy says
Can’t be fired for boozing in canada, they need to offer treatment before they straight up fire you because its an “addiction”
BolivianDancer says
High definition piss jugs.
[deleted] says
[removed]