No one should be threatening anyone, but “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male” is not a good definition. Likewise having a definition of male including “having a gender identity that is the opposite of female,” is also not good. Going to “gender identity” you get “a person’s internal sense of being male, female, some combination of male and female, or neither male nor female.” In other words these particular definitions are circular.
So “female” could thus be defined as “having a gender identity that is the opposite of having a gender identity that is the opposite of female.”
Further, under these definitions one could translate gender identify as “a person’s internal sense of being the opposite of having a gender identity that is the opposite of male, a person’s internal sense of being the opposite of having a gender identity that is the opposite of female, some combination of having a gender identity that is the opposite of male or the opposite of female, or neither having a gender identity that is the opposite of male or female.”
You can genuinely tell how privileged people are by how much time/effort they spend on this ridiculous subject.
“Kids dying from starvation and disease? Screw em’. My time is better served arguing over pointless definitions.”
It’s so exhausting watching two sides of the same self centered group argue over such nonsense. I’m tired of hearing people can care about more thing than one when one thing causes extreme pain and death and the other makes a tiny minority sad. I’m tired of hearing the opposition cry like this tiny minority is some outrageous group causing the collapse of society. Both are just bored and spoiled.
deegeese says
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
Starfire70 says
I can just see Kid Rock reacting like, “Is what he did, threatening to kill people, was that really that wrong?”
CaymanRich says
It’s about time one of these terrorists got locked up.
impulsiveclick says
Oh finally
twitch_delta_blues says
No one should be threatening anyone, but “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male” is not a good definition. Likewise having a definition of male including “having a gender identity that is the opposite of female,” is also not good. Going to “gender identity” you get “a person’s internal sense of being male, female, some combination of male and female, or neither male nor female.” In other words these particular definitions are circular.
So “female” could thus be defined as “having a gender identity that is the opposite of having a gender identity that is the opposite of female.”
Further, under these definitions one could translate gender identify as “a person’s internal sense of being the opposite of having a gender identity that is the opposite of male, a person’s internal sense of being the opposite of having a gender identity that is the opposite of female, some combination of having a gender identity that is the opposite of male or the opposite of female, or neither having a gender identity that is the opposite of male or female.”
Linguistically, it’s meaningless.
sylv0028 says
I can’t fathom being so enraged over something (one’s gender identity) that absolutely does not impact me in any manner.
spoonybard326 says
Next year they should use his mugshot to illustrate the definition of “snowflake”.
ChanThe4th says
You can genuinely tell how privileged people are by how much time/effort they spend on this ridiculous subject.
“Kids dying from starvation and disease? Screw em’. My time is better served arguing over pointless definitions.”
It’s so exhausting watching two sides of the same self centered group argue over such nonsense. I’m tired of hearing people can care about more thing than one when one thing causes extreme pain and death and the other makes a tiny minority sad. I’m tired of hearing the opposition cry like this tiny minority is some outrageous group causing the collapse of society. Both are just bored and spoiled.
frealfr says
What is a female?
Fuzakenaideyo says
Shouldn’t female vs male be clinical sexual stuff not gender identity stuff